tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15022376.post113535495859571149..comments2007-06-14T02:44:03.869-07:00Cutshawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09761104278691404561noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15022376.post-45314543366546922242007-06-14T02:44:00.000-07:002007-06-14T02:44:00.000-07:002007-06-14T02:44:00.000-07:00molly finneran was 5 years old and pregnant while writing this remark. king kong is my x husband and id rather not have some knocked up spappa wave all this abuse in my lovers luminous facial complexion, i wish also to point out that king kong and i are back together.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15022376.post-1141230591961996632006-03-01T08:29:00.000-08:002006-03-01T08:29:00.000-08:002006-03-01T08:29:00.000-08:00King Kong, the remake, dinosaurs, romance and elaborate special effects. It did well enough at the box office and made millions, but was probably one the biggest let down of 2005. For those who have seen the original, it was just too over done. What was supposed to be a glorious revival of a timeless classic turned into a jumbled mess of over rated and over done special effects.<BR/> It seemed to be divided into three parts, on the boat, on the island, and back in the city. The beginning seemed promising, the part on the boat was really quite interesting but that’s about when it peaked, from then on it went downhill, fast. Around forty five minutes into the movie you begin to lose interest. As soon as the boat gets to the island, the dialoged seems to just disappear into a series of grunts and screams. Between the giant bugs and the dinosaurs, there were more excruciating death scenes than I have ever seen in one movie. <BR/> A lot of people might have liked this movie but personally it was a total waist of money, if you bye the DVD or if you see it in theaters. It was the kind of movie that you could just get up in to go get food and not be rushing back to your seat. The worst thing by far though was how long it was, around three hours of dull mediocre entertainment. It would have been terrible if you needed to go to the bathroom, the horrendous length ensured that most of the audience had to get up at one point or another, and miss a part of the movie. <BR/> The uninspiring performances and what seemed to be a lack of emotion, in what was supposed to be a horror movie was also disappointing. The CG animation was not bad though the King Kong him self was chillingly life like. It was just up to the cast which included stars like Naomi Watts, Jack Black, and Adrien Brody to deliver, but unfortunately, they did not. Personally it was the acting that really brought the whole movie down. <BR/> Being one of Peter Jackson’s first films after the lord of the Ring series, the two probably will be compared, which is a sad thing, because the conclusion will no be good. He really went over board, the potential for this movie was so great that it was just such a let down. If he had condensed the movie into one normal length one it could have been very affective, but it really just could not live up to the original, no matter how many special affects it had.Molly Finnerannoreply@blogger.com